iPhone spends 7 hours at the bottom of the sea and starts working again

The water resistance available in many cell phones is often unpredictable, and may work in some cases and not in others. For the owner of an iPhone that fell overboard during a paddleboarding session in the UK, this protection proved to be effective.

iPhone spends 7 hours at the bottom of the sea and starts working again
iPhone spends 7 hours at the bottom of the sea and starts working again

In a post that went viral on Reddit on Monday (18), user “VAN_DOOM” said he lost his smartphone after five minutes of paddleboarding in the English Channel, on the British coast. About seven hours after the incident, the phone started working again, at the bottom of the sea, and had the signal picked up by the Find iPhone tool .

iPhone 14 can leave SIM aside and use only eSIM

iPhone spends 7 hours at the bottom of the sea and starts working again
iPhone spends 7 hours at the bottom of the sea and starts working again

The internet user says that it was possible to rescue the device after the location provided by the Apple app (see the image below), but does not provide further details on how this action occurred. Apparently, the phone was located off the coast of Brighton, England.

Iphone 14 Images

In the post, it is also informed that the cell phone rescued from the sea floor has “no damage”, even though it was submerged for several hours. The netizen also did not comment on which model of iPhone was used when the device sank in the English Channel.

Brazilian was not so lucky

Unlike the iPhone recovered at the bottom of the sea in the UK, which returned to work, a Brazilian whose smartphone came into contact with water was not so lucky. As FolhaMax reported , the iPhone XR of a resident of Cuiabá (MT) stopped working after the device received “water splashes”.

iPhone 8 Plus explodes and leaves man with loss of vision

With the warranty still in effect, the owner sued Apple, who refused to repair the phone, claiming that the screen defects were not repairable. Faced with the denial, he filed a lawsuit against the manufacturer and emerged victorious, entitled to receive compensation of R$ 9.6 thousand for moral and material damages - the decision is still subject to appeal.

Next Post Previous Post
No Comment
Add Comment
comment url